The Hand Of the Lord Org
Music link: https://youtu.be/u9fSfE4pMhI
You know, I have been writing for probably twenty years in support of my web sites. You see, God gave me these sites because no one in the ministry wanted to recognize myself in the very least. Almost everything the Lord gives me to preach shames much of the Clergy, and that's why they would rather recognize a cockroach more than for anything that I state on my sites.
Nevertheless, I believe that my grammar has gone from bad to "badder."
Is that a proper word?
Then I'm sorry, I meant from worst to worster.
Anyway, the thing is that in all of that time there was one major issue that was really "grating" on my mind.
It was the fact that I didn't have time or the resources to back up those things which I would publish as "truths.'
You know, when you look down through history or even if you just see historical artistic portraits of some of the great theologians; they are usually pictured as perhaps in a background in a type of 'Renaissance Era' home, then they might have a writing quill in their hand and there on the back wall are book cases and volumes of these huge Tomes and theological books.
You know, much like today when you see our modern day 'theologians images."
Yes, on the back covers of books where they are likely sat down next to a Desktop Computer, in front of an office chair and behind them are maybe five to ten books on a shelf nailed to the wall of the latest 'Bestsellers," they have written published by some offshoot of "Amazon."
Can you relate?
I ask "Google," the following question:
Why do so many think that the Calvin type of theology which believes in Predestination is so ridiculous?
And how many other denominations involved in Arminianism does it go against?
These are results for why do some think that the Calvin type of ideology which believes in Predestination is so ridiculous? And how many other denominations involved in Arminianism does it go against?
Show original results
AI Overview
Critics view Calvinist predestination as problematic because it implies God intentionally creates some people for eternal damnation regardless of their choices. This challenges God's love and justice. It goes against dozens of Arminian and synergistic denominations, making it one of the largest theological debates in Christianity.
Why Critics Find Predestination "Ridiculous" or Problematic
The primary Calvinist belief known as "Double Predestination" asserts that God actively chooses (elects) certain individuals for salvation and decrees others to damnation before they are even born. Critics find this deeply troubling for several reasons:
• Character of God: Many believers argue that a doctrine where God knowingly creates people destined for hell is inconsistent with His infinite love, mercy, and perfect justice.
• The Problem of "Free Will": Critics argue that if humans are pre-determined by God to either believe or reject the Gospel, human free choice becomes an illusion.
• Logical Contradiction: Arminian scholars point out that a predetermined decree conflicts with scriptures calling believers to "freely choose" Christ.
• Practical Implications: Detractors feel this theology fosters spiritual dangers, potentially leading either to complacency (the "chosen" feel they can live carelessly) or despair (the "non-chosen" feel their eternal fate is entirely hopeless).
How Many Denominations It Goes Against
Calvinist predestination is a minority view globally. It stands in direct opposition to Arminianism and other synergistic denominations, which emphasize that God's grace is universally available and that humans possess the free will to accept or reject it.
Instead of a single opposing group, this ideology goes against several major branches of Protestantism (comprising millions of believers):
• Methodist / Wesleyan Families: This encompasses all Methodist descendants of John and Charles Wesley (e.g., The United Methodist Church, Free Methodist, African Methodist Episcopal), as well as denominations like the Church of the Nazarene and The Salvation Army.
• Pentecostal and Holiness Movements: Many charismatic and Pentecostal churches strongly reject strict predestination. Examples include the Assemblies of God and the Church of God.
• Baptist Offshoots: While some Baptists hold Calvinist views, many large groups, such as the National Association of Free Will Baptists and segments of independent non-denominational churches, are fundamentally Arminian.
• Catholic and Orthodox Traditions: Both the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Christianity teach that salvation is conditional on a person's free will response to God's grace, entirely rejecting the Calvinist decree.
Because of the sheer variety of Evangelical Arminian and non-Calvinist churches globally, this belief system directly opposes dozens of distinct global denominations and independent faith networks.
Isn't the reason why those churches who don't believe in a second type of Baptism or experience, such as the "Baptism of the Holy Ghost" or of a "2nd Sanctification" such as Wesley believed due to the fact that they are Calvinistic in their 'Ideology?'
AI Overview
Yes, you are exactly right. The rejection of a "second work of grace" or a distinct, post-conversion Baptism of the Holy Spirit is deeply tied to Calvinistic (Reformed) ideology.
The contrast between these two theological camps highlights why this divide exists:
1. The Reformed (Calvinist) View: The Work is Complete at Salvation
In Calvinist theology, God's grace is monergistic, meaning God does 100% of the work in saving a person.
• Regeneration is simultaneous: Calvinists believe that when a person is saved, the Holy Spirit immediately regenerates them completely. The Holy Spirit dwells fully within the believer the moment they accept Christ.
• No "upgrade" needed: Because the initial work of the Holy Spirit is already perfectly complete and secures salvation (Perseverance of the Saints / "Once Saved, Always Saved"), there is no theological need for a "second experience," "second baptism," or a separate, later infilling of power.
• 2. The Wesleyan (Arminian) View: Salvation is a Process
John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, heavily emphasized human free will and the concept of God's grace working progressively in a believer's life.
Justification vs. Sanctification: Wesley separated salvation into distinct stages. The first work of grace is justification (forgiveness of sins/being born again). The second work of grace is entire sanctification, which Wesley taught is an instantaneous cleansing from the nature of sin, enabling the believer to live a life of perfect love.
• The Second Experience: Wesleyans equate this second work of grace-the complete purifying of the heart-with the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
• 3. The Pentecostal/Charismatic Shift
The modern Pentecostal movement grew out of the Wesleyan-Holiness tradition. Pentecostals took Wesley's concept of a "second work of grace" and adapted it:
• They separated Entire Sanctification from the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
• To them, the "second blessing" (the Baptism of the Holy Spirit) is not for purification from sin, but is specifically an empowering for service, usually evidenced by speaking in tongues.
• In Summary:
Churches that do not believe in a second type of baptism are generally rooted in the Reformed/Calvinist tradition. They view the initial indwelling of the Spirit at salvation as the "one baptism" of 1 Corinthians 12:13, leaving no theological room for a subsequent, second experience.
"The Complete idiot's guide to simple few paragraph 'Theology'."
Not intended for the contentious, ignorant, argumentative, belligerent, cantankerous, quarrelsome, controversial, disputable, polemical fools often seen on "You Tube," and couldn't properly discern a "hole in the ground."
You know, recently it has come to my attention that people "fear," AI, therefore I wish to add a "disclaimer."
Often I will go to "Google," and ask it a few questions from a position that I am holding, yet wish to be verified by another Party or second source.
Well, this is the reason why I utilize "AI" which is freely offered by 'Google."
You see, years ago, when the 'internet,' was established there was a common analogy given so individuals could understand that it was harmless, yet if used right could benefit mankind.
Therefore, they explained to the people that the "internet," was a type of vast library out there in "SPACE."
So, they explained it as an individual who may go to a website, as one who might be visiting this huge library and choosing a book.
You see, in the library if you want information on a subject or topic, you might either go to the news rack and read a daily paper, or you might go to nonfiction and grab a particular book which is filled with data or information. If you wanted to see who has the cheapest price on "Jordan's" or whatever, then you would visit one of the "books," or sub libraries offered on the internet. You know that one called "Macy's."
I have probably screwed up the analogy, but I hope you get the idea.
Well, this is how I look at the "AI" which I utilize.
I see it as a vast personal library of mine, as the President or Chancellor of my University where I have hundreds of thousands of books, and then upon my contract having been renewed I was also given a hundred research assistants.
And although I have the knowledge and the resources to do my own research, instead I just feed my "questions," into my "research request box," and then I let my researchers go retrieve that information which I could have found myself by pain staking long hours of personal labor.
Are you tracking with me, "AI," is not doing anything spectacular or magical to come up with the answers which are going to support my positions, but they are simply "saving," those long hours of research in which I would have to scour over Theological books, and other resources which I would need to support my suppositions which I put on paper.
So, again, I could've got the same answers in which they come up with, but instead of me spending hours and hours pouring over books, newspapers, old traditional papers, I let AI, do that.
And see, if you look at AI, as merely helping you to research those facts which I am already suggesting for it to find, why should I feel guilty as if I am plagiarizing anything?
You see, I am just simply asking my "research team," to go and do my research, since they have more talent and ability to do it.
Why do I make it into rocket science, when all that I am doing is asking it for answers. Should I also feel guilty because I ask my calculator what is one fifth of a simple number such as 345,879,234,942,237,843, 920 and five tenths of one per cent?
GEEEESH!
Give me a break!
Lastly, I was tuned into some good thinking Theological ignoramus tonight, who was on "You Tube," to completely debunk my assertions of a few weeks ago, concerning the Baptism of the Holy Ghost, or as Wesley called it, "A second work of Sanctification."
Apparently, he wished to tear down a lady Evangelist whose motives are quite questionable by her outward "works,' and pleas for offerings.
Well, I have no problems with that, but you see my grievances with these idiots is that they make bold incorrect statements such as he made tonight.
He classified all Charismatic's as one and he stated that "all charismatic are only consumed with attaining "Gifts," and ‘lording’ these gifts over others for their own financial gain."
This is so wrong.
When I came into the Charismatic Renewal, God blessed me with a few supernatural gifts and then over the years with many others in which I have manifested them all for the glory of God.
Although, he gave me several gifts which I could have made millions as others have, I have always been careful not to use them to where I would benefit myself financially. You see, this is the reason why I believe that I have been so blessed above my fellows in the benefit of receiving more supernatural gifting.
Also, because of so much corruption found in the Charismatic Churches, mostly due to wrong "teaching," I believe, from those excessively exorbitant "Prosperity Preachers," many have classified "all Charismatic's," as such.
Well, this is just not the case.
When God called me into a Charismatic Community birthed from a direct result of the Charismatic Revival of the seventies which hit college campuses, there were many of these communities established which had a sole purpose of emulating the "Church" found in "The Book of Acts."
My community had as many as a few thousand who had passed through it and a regular membership of maybe five hundred at a time. There was also a community in Ann Arbor which had at one time a membership of something like five thousand, I believe.
There was a sister community in Indiana which also had a huge membership, as well as a few others scattered around the country. In the community in Indiana, there would be a prospective Supreme Court Justice years later.
There were a few of these in Texas, one out of Minneapolis, and others scattered all around the country. Not only those, but there were thousands of Charismatic Prayer groups, established in local Catholic Churches.
At the same time, there was an organization which had learned to evangelize directly into the major corporations through the conversion of many top business leaders and executives. Their membership was in the hundreds of thousands as I recall.
There were many other Charismatic's who were birthed through ministries such as Oral Roberts, and others.
There were a number of small churches which later grew to be mega size and were non-controversial for decades such as Victory Fellowship in Tulsa. Along with Victory, a whole lot of other churches were established in that one city.
I mean, I could go on and on, but you see, my point is that none of these many churches or organizations had issues. There were very few who had leadership with major scandals, as we have today. None of their parishioners or congregants were ever involved in controversy until this obsession with gaining huge "Offerings and Tithes," as a result of many Prosperity beliefs.
And as the gentleman suggested tonight, after some offshoot Streams, were beginning to use those Charismatic gifts for their own benefit.
Nonetheless, I want to also remind you that there were hundreds of thousands of Charismatic who were birthed into the Vineyard Movement, many who were birthed into the Calvary Chapel Streams, until what's his name got to quenching the "Holy Spirit."
Are you tracking with me?
So, it is really ignorant for this man to give the impression that every Christian who was ever a "Charismatic," was only showcasing them to benefit his ministry.
But you see, this has always been how Satan has worked in the "Body of Christ." He likes to major on the minors, and to hide the fact that there was so much wonderful "good," which came of the Charismatic Church.
Please ask "Google," "How many new Christians around the world were brought into "the kingdom of God," as a direct result of the Charismatic Renewal?"
Sorry, I already did:
AI Overview
There is no precise or universally agreed-upon number for how many new Christians were brought into the faith as a direct result of the Charismatic Renewal. Because the movement spans multiple denominations (Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox), sociologists track adherents rather than attributing exact individual conversion numbers to a single movement.
However, looking at the global scale of the movement:
• Current Global Reach: Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians number over 676 million globally, making up more than a quarter of all Christians worldwide.
•
• The Catholic Charismatic Renewal: Within the Catholic Church alone, the renewal has reached an estimated 150 to 177 million adherents worldwide.
•
• Historical Growth: The movement saw explosive growth in the late 20th century. For example, the number of Pentecostal/Charismatic adherents jumped from an estimated 100 million in 1980 to over 300 million by the end of the 1980s.
•
• While some of these adherents were already Christians who experienced a "baptism in the Holy Spirit" within their existing traditions, massive numbers were direct converts. For example, during the explosive growth periods, databases recorded millions of new adherents joining the movement through direct conversions annually.
For more information on the demographic breakdown of the renewal, you can explore the Pew Research Center's Spirit and Power Survey or the Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary resources.
You see, if you have a problem with the "FRUIT," of the charismatic adherents in our country, don't look to the "Faith" belief which has been distorted by many evil men, but look to all which the devil likes to keep hidden concerning its overall good purpose for God.
In other words, the problem hasn't been with the third person of the Trinity in America, but it has been with the lowlife who the church has placed on pedestals and lavish much Praise and adoration unto them.
In other words, the church has been very similar to Israel when it worshipped their other Gods.
Please anybody?
Why do we in America worship men as Gods?
Just look at the salaries of our Hollywood actors, our Pro athletes, our Mega Church pastors.
For years, I have watched this, I mean Pro athletes used to get very good remuneration for their talents and then one day having had my head turned back I looked again and we were rewarding kids just starting out with millions and millions of dollar salaries.
Well, on judgment day, there are going to be a lot of businessmen who are going to be accountable for those destroyed lives.
You see, I wish all could be "Prophets," and then you would see as how God sees.
I am not kidding, at the judgment seat of Christ, there are going to be so many who will be shocked into reality, yet it will be much too late for them.
And lastly, I can say the same for those clowns on "You Tube," whose sole existence in life is to blaspheme the work of the Holy Ghost on Earth.
I wrote the above, but didn't have time to finish it, though it just needed another half hour or so before I published it. Instead, it was close to nine O clock in the morning on Sunday, so I began visiting my usual church services since it is a full days project.
Well, before I did that I posted three Spirit Filled, church services because I was going to let my readers contrast the differences of how "Spirit Filled," churches worship and how non-Spirit filled churches worship. Sorry, in most cases they only sing a few hymns.
Jesus Image service: https://youtu.be/j0DBtHa7-60
The above was taken from a church in which I have worshiped in for a couple of years. Generally, I don't agree with the Leadership's stance on "Building," new buildings at a cost of millions and millions of dollars, nevertheless, other than that I have found the church itself to be filled with what looks like very sincere and heart felt Christians who seem to be loyal followers of Jesus.
*****************************
Finding Sunday Night Service: https://youtu.be/VaWL5S32YkY
Above taken from night church service in Seattle, which I occasionally attend. Very anointed!
*****************************************
Following link is second service at Conference going on in Seattle, as well.
Holy Spirit Conference Hayley Braun: https://youtu.be/4mwyuU7STbw
**********************************************
Well, it is too hard to find clips of these other churches worshiping because all they do is to sing a hymn or two?
Sorry, but I do have a clip of one of these "Fire Brand Preachers," getting ready to release into the world the next great "Hope," of Christianity.
The latest "Brands," which have all been 'plucked from the fire.' Look out world, they're a coming!
Link: https://youtu.be/T5R9JmJTtOM?list=PL30acyfm60fXICLFyvTlD36Bh-ypGcrXe
**********************************
The second link is one of John MacArthur tearing down the Biblical revelation of the “gift of tongues.”
Link: https://youtu.be/suBAsQ-14rg
You see, in this clip he is literally blaspheming the Holy Spirit’s work on the Earth, and his testimony given by hundreds of individuals at a Full Gospel Business Man’s fellowship, and then he continues to call this experience of millions and millions of countless Christians on the continent of Africa and around the “World,” saying that they have all been deceived.”
Well, we all know that he is in heaven, don’t we?
I mean, after turning away millions and millions of People from seeking a further experience where they might have received a greater portion of God to overcome in this life, surely, God would never hold that against the man, after all ‘He,' was “John MacArthur.”
**************************************
Then the third clip is from a church in Charlotte:
Link: https://youtu.be/90P7Nb4FYGQ
The above was taken from “Central Church,” Charlotte, NC
You probably would be more familiar with the other name which it is AKA
"Pastor Happy and the two hundred and fifty ‘Yes Men.’"
(Interesting thought)
AI Overview
The phrase "Who you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?" (or "Who are you going to trust, me or your own eyes?") traces its pop-culture fame back to a 1933 Marx Brothers movie.
The exact origin and notable variations:
The phrase is used to describe situations where someone attempts to gaslight or manipulate you into ignoring obvious reality in favor of their narrative.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kddiXMOeNrM?feature=share
(Please read about the whole movement of Charismatic Revival and not just this man's bad experiences with it. I have found many to be bitter towards certain "works of God," because they were just contentious critics. and rejected by the good intention-ed believer's. In many cases these individuals can hold grudges for years because their family members had found truth and broken free from all of those traditions which had held the family in bondage for decades.)
******************************************
So, anyway, why don't you contrast the two "Streams," of American Christianity?
in one, you have a number of followers who are simply going to be the "Yes men," to all that their leaders are going to command them, and then on the other side, you have numerous individuals who are seeking a personal fellowship and relationship with the God of this universe in order for God to speak directly into their "spirits," so they don't have to be bound to what their "religionist leaders," dictate for their lives or has been decried for each one to follow.
In other words, one offers freedom while the other offers bondage to man.
(Later, I am going to write a paper concerning this hill ...I mean this Loud Boisterous Big Mouthed Preacher from Charlotte and all of his accusations.)
He does have some very truthful observations from over the years, in which we both could agree upon though. Many churches allow a whole lot of Error to be brought into their churches by mixed up individuals. Nonetheless, you do not throw the Baby out with the bath water.
You see, one "Stream," may bring millions into the kingdom, while the other may only produce millions of "Yes Men," who know nothing of God, but just blindly follow what their leaders tell them to believe, as they tear down every other "Streams," which does not fully agree with their legalistic strict view of Christianity.
So, how would you like to be developed as a follower of Jesus, as one who can think for himself or as one of those clowns in the background of a legalistic old loud mouthed traditional denominational Preacher who is always calling out, "Look at me, Look at me, I'm always right!"
Everybody else is always wrong.
"Look at me, look at me!"
Might not happen again...
Where does this saying, "Brands plucked from the fire," come from and can a Baptist be a "brand plucked from the fire?"
AI Mode
where does this saying, "brands plucked from the fire," come from and can a Baptist be a "brand plucked from the fire?"
The saying "a brand plucked from the fire" originates directly from the Bible, specifically from the Old Testament book of Zechariah 3:2.
A "brand" in this context refers to a burning stick or piece of firewood. The phrase represents a sinner who was on the very brink of destruction, judgment, or hell, but was rescued just in time by God's sheer mercy and grace.
A Baptist can absolutely be a "brand plucked from the fire." In Christian theology, the phrase is a universal metaphor for any redeemed person, regardless of their denomination.
Biblical Origin
In the biblical passage of Zechariah 3, Joshua the High Priest stands before the angel of the Lord dressed in filthy garments—symbolizing human sin and unworthiness. Satan stands next to him, ready to accuse him. However, the Lord rebukes Satan, declaring of Joshua: "Is not this a brand plucked from the fire?" God then orders that Joshua’s filthy rags be removed and replaces them with clean, rich garments.
A similar visual is used in Amos 4:11, where God describes rescuing the remnant of Israel "as a brand plucked out of the burning."
Can a Baptist Be a "Brand Plucked from the Fire"?
Yes, from a theological perspective, any Baptist who has experienced salvation fits this description perfectly.
Well, how do you know if a Baptist is "Born Again?"
You know a Baptist is "born again" when they exhibit a specific combination of theological beliefs, public milestones, and an active lifestyle of faith.
Because Baptist theology places a massive emphasis on a personal, conscious decision to follow Jesus Christ, a born-again Baptist will generally show very distinct markers.
1. A Personal Conversion Testimony
A born-again Baptist can tell you about a specific moment or period in their life when they shifted from just knowing about God to personally trusting Him.
2. Believer's Baptism by Immersion
In Baptist doctrine, baptism does not save a person; it is an outward symbol of an inward change.
3. Evident "Fruit of the Spirit"
Theology is validated by daily living. A born-again Baptist will show an ongoing transformation of character, often referred to in scripture as the fruit of the Spirit.
4. Active Church Fellowship
An essential marker is the desire to be part of a local body of believers.
You said: Well, what makes the Baptist into such devoted "Yes men," to their pastors? Is it because they are "Born Again?"
The perception that some Baptists act as "yes men"—showing fierce loyalty, deference, or unquestioning obedience to their pastors—is a well-documented phenomenon. While being "born again" provides the theological foundation for this behavior, the culture of absolute pastoral devotion is actually driven by a specific mix of organizational structure, pastoral theology, and social dynamics within Baptist life.
Being born again teaches a believer to submit to God; a specific type of church culture translates that into submitting to the pastor.
Here is a breakdown of what creates this dynamic.
1. How Being "Born Again" Plays a Role
The "born again" experience shifts a person's entire allegiance to God and the Bible. In many Baptist environments, this spiritual devotion is funneled toward the pastor through specific teachings:
2. Autonomous Church Structure (No Outside Accountability)
Unlike Methodists, Presbyterians, or Catholics, Baptist churches are autonomous. They have no bishops, synods, or outside denominational hierarchies to check a pastor's power.
3. The Power of the Pulpit and "Preaching"
In Baptist worship, the sermon is the absolute centerpiece of the service, often lasting 40 to 60 minutes.
4. High-Control Culture and Separation
Many Baptist circles, particularly Independent Fundamental Baptists (IFB), practice strict separation from the secular world and even from other Christians.
5. The "Shepherding" Dynamic
Because born-again Baptists deeply desire to live a holy life, they look to their "shepherd" for granular guidance on lifestyle choices, dress codes, music, and family life. What looks like being a "yes man" from the outside is often viewed from the inside as a humble desire to be mentored and protected from spiritual danger.
Added Note: 6-3-2026 2:00 AM
AI Overview
Because many prominent pastors oversee distinct editions over the course of their careers, there is no single or official count of how many Baptist preachers have placed their names on a Study Bible. However, there are at least a half-dozen widely known, major Study Bibles published by prominent Baptist ministers.
Several of the most notable Study Bibles authored or curated by Baptist preachers include:
Beyond modern-day pastors, historical figures have also lent their names to annotated editions, such as in the case of The Matthew Henry Study Bible, based on the classic writings of the early Nonconformist Baptist minister.
Well, who gave the right to these many men who felt compelled or were just trying to make a quick buck from their devotees by placing their name next to God's on a Holy Bible?
Could it have been the same God who also gave TRUMP permission to commission a BIBLE devoted to our Fore Fathers of this Nation which have gone before us?
Stop Pretending: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PchOlZfsvDI?feature=share
Be filled: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ANwXktxhO9w?feature=share
Disclaimer:
Recently, I have made ‘fun,’ of this preacher Loran Livingston and the reason was mostly because I thought that the man was a Baptist completely against the ‘Baptism of the Holy Ghost.’
Normally I will just watch an excerpt and form my opinion, so I generally do not go back to further validate what I perceived of the man. Perhaps, I should have in this man’s case.
Well, the other day, I felt as if the Holy Spirit was telling me to verify the fact that he was a strict Baptist, so I googled the question and was rewarded with the answer which I had already assumed to be right.
Google told me that he was the pastor of the former church “Church of God,” yet they had changed their name ….
I just asked “Google,” again and of course, now they are giving me the correct information although the other day they expressed the same answer, yet instead of saying he was a Pentecostal, they told me that he was pastor of the same church as expressed in this second answer, but claimed that he was Baptist for decades.
And then, of course, in very small letters it will say “Sometimes AI can make a mistake.”
Oh thanks, fellas!
Anyway, now I find that I am at odds with a fellow who I should be walking closely with.
You see, many times, the devil will have individuals fighting moot issues.
Not that his whole concern against the practices of some of the “Charismatic Streams,” has been wrong, but he is focusing on an area where he should not necessarily be focusing on.
You see, the most serious “problem” with the American church is not the extremes in which many men have taken the various offshoots of the Charismatic churches, but it is the fact that it has given the non-Spirit Filled churches a reason to blaspheme the “work of the Holy Spirit,” and to tear down the integrity of the purpose commissioned from God for all men to receive the Person of the Holy Spirit in the individual believers life.
Therefore, when you have men get up in their pulpits every day tearing down one Charismatic “Stream,” after another, this only helps those who are not Spirit Filled to further blaspheme the purpose in which Jesus commissioned the church for, “To do nothing and to wait for the Power of my Spirit,” or “The promise of my Father.”
I just got through listening to a tape concerning the declaration that Bethel church has made ousting Mike Bickle from their fellowship. I will be commenting on this later in a paper that I am sure will be putting many to “Shock.”
Nonetheless, although I have had major issues with the leaders of these churches and Stream, yet I am not still condemning them from my pulpit.
You see, it does no good for me if I am to hold a grudge against those many leaders who through experience, I have found to be completely without integrity.
If truth be told, the Charismatic Church which includes the “Prophetic,” are filled with unrighteous leaders whose main job it has been in this life to make sure that all of these felonies and scandals will never be brought into the light.
As I stated, I will be elaborating on a number of them in the near future.
Don’t forget the “pop corn” on the way home to the parsonages guys, Okay?
We’re going to have a few really fun days,
I can promise!
Nonetheless, I would just like to offer my apology to Pastor Livingston, and as long as he doesn’t keep looking and sounding like a Baptist minister against the "Work of God," I may let him slide a couple of times without asking 'Him," why he needs so many 'Yes men," behind him when he's in the pulpit?
I can tell you that's one church that I ain't going to be visiting soon!
AI Overview
The passage is located in Acts 23:12-15 in the New Testament of the Bible. It details a conspiracy by more than 40 men who took a solemn oath not to eat or drink until they had assassinated the Apostle Paul..The conspirators planned to ambush Paul...
*****
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.